Ingatkan mereka akan sejarah Bangsanya yg ber Negara berlandaskan Adat Rakyat Bersultan, Negeri Beraja.
Jun 16, 2013
Dataran Tahsim, Dataran Tahrir & Dataran Merdeka
May 4, 2010
Kisah Tragik Amirul...
Kisah yg berlaku terhadap Amirul amat tragik sekali. Macamana seorg yg baru 15 tahun mati tertembak @ ditembak polis. Mencari salah siapa bukan caranya tetapi kita perlu mengetahui pandangan kedua-dua pihak.
Perjalanan peristiwa tersebut yg penuh dgn adegan kejar mengejar, kemalangan jalan raya, kereta bergesal, motosikal mengejar & juga akhirnya melibatkan polis akan menimbulkan persepsi awal yg negatif jika kita berada di tempat kejadian. Malah kita mesti akan memikirkan sesuatu yg tidak kena kepada pemandu & kereta tersebut sehinggakan kejar-mengejar berlaku yg berakhir tragik.
Dari satu segi pula, Amirul bersama rakan dikatakan keluar curi-curi utk minum menonton bola dgn memandu kereta kakaknya tanpa lesen, tanpa kebenaran & juga pengetahuan ibu bapa. Beliau juga dikatakan panik, langgar lari & ingkar arahan polis utk berhenti yg akhirnya membawa kepada tragedi tragik tersebut. Remaja yg baru berusia 15thn mati akibat peluru sesat yg disasarkan kepada tayar kereta berkenaan. Masyallah.. Mmg tragik peristiwa tersebut & amat jarang2 berlaku di negara kita.
Dalam pada itu seperti biasa akan terdapat segelintir 'oppurtunist' yg cuba mengeskploitasi keadaan tersebut utk menyemai semangat kebencian terhadap agensi penguatkuasa iaitu PDRM. Pada hemat cek, pihak keluarga berkenaan perlu redo dgn apa yg berlaku & dalam pada itu meminta Suruhanjaya Diraja ditubuhkan bagi mencari kebenaran terhadap isu tersebut. Mungkin cadangan drpd Suruhanjaya ini boleh digunakan utk menambah baik sistem kepolisan negara.
Jgnlah kita menyalahkan PDRM atas apa yg berlaku. Kejadian seperti ini amat dikesali ttp ini tidak menggambarkan keseluruhan 'professionalisme' badan berkenaan. Akhir kata, tolong pantau anak-anak kita, adik-adik kita & jaga tepi kain jiran2 utk mengelakkan keadaan seperti ini berlaku.
p/s: Polis jgn pulak hilang semangat nak buat kerja dek disbbkan isu ini..
Jul 9, 2009
PPSMI Antara Harapan & Realilti
Harapan
Perlu dilihat pada tahun 2003 dibawah Tun Dr Mahathir dasar ini diperkenalkan. Ia diperkenalkan bertujuan murni iaitu utk melihat bangsa Malaysia berdaya saing di peringkat global sejajar dgn trend Globalisasi dunia. Pada ketika itu penentangan PPSMI tidak sehebat mana. Malah ramai yg bersetuju dgn cadangan tersebut atas dasar & harapan kerajaan yg dinyatakan sebelum ini.
Terdapat sedikit kecacatan diwaktu perlaksanaan PPSMI sewaktu itu. Antaranya adalah kekurangan guru yg mahir dalam kedua2 matapelajaran PPSMI. Apa2pun kita perlu tahu perlaksanaan PPSMI adalah usaha murni kerajaan utk meningkatkan daya saing rakyat terhadap pasaran global.
ATAS Dasar Itu Ramai Menyokong Perlaksanaan PPSMI (saya juga)
Realiti
Setelah hampir 6 tahun PPSMI diperkenalkan, tahun demi tahun pemantauan dibuat utk melihat keberkesanannya. Realitinya ternyata program PPSMI tidak berjaya & tidak mencapat sasaran terutama sekali bila melibatkan kawasan pedalaman.
Mungkin ramai yg kecewa & mungkin ramai yg suka. Pada dasarnya saya menentang PPSMI bukan kerana bahasa jiwa bangsa, bukan kerana takut kepada kedudukan BM & bukan kerana politik sepeti PAS. Tetapi adalah kerana memikirkan nasib pelajar Luar bandar jika PPSMI diteruskan.
Kita sudah sedia maklum Subjek Bahasa Inggeris sendiri menjadi Tabo' kepada kebanyakan pelajar luar bandar, jadi adakah menjadi kan PPSMI sebagai sandaran adalah langkah bijak. Kita juga tahu yg serba serbi pelajar luar bandar adalah terkebelakang maka dgn adanya polisi ini akan menyebabkn mereka lebih ketinggalan. Bila pemberian biasiswa nnti adalah berdasarkan merit jadi dimana pelajar2 luar bandar kita?
Seperti kita suruh lumba lari 100m antara budak umur 15 (pelajar dlm bandar) vs 12 tahun (pelajar luar bandar). Kemudian pelajar 15 tahun tu pulak dapat training dr guru sukan profesional.. Itulah keadaannya.. Jika PPSMI diteruskan & berdasarkan statistic makin tinggilah kadar drop-out dikalangan pelajar luar bandar & makin tinggilah jurang antara pelajar bandar & luar bandar.
Dan dengan keadaan sekarang Polisi Kerajaan yg cenderung memberi bantuan biasiswa berdasarkan merit maka tak mustahil rata2 yg menerima biasiswa ini merupakan pelajar bandar yg berkemampuan.
~~
Isu PPSMI diharap tidak dipolitikkan. Ia hanya merupakan Harapan murni Tun Mahathir @ kerajaan terdahulu. Tetapi Realitinya PPSMI jelas tidak menguntungkan majoriti Pelajar malaysia terutama pelajar luar bandar.
Related Article :
PPSMI : Wajarkah diteruskan @ dibatalkan?Mar 14, 2009
Coret-coret DAP - Gantung Gobind & Wilayah Dikembalikan ke Selangor?
Cadangan untuk mengambil semula wilayah dilihat sebagai amat biasa. Disokongi oleh hujah2 yg nampak masuk akal secara tersurat. Tetapi jika diteliti dgn lebih mendalam, cadangan tersebut nampak cantik utk DAP secara tersirat. Telah sedia maklum, kebanyakan kerusi Parlimen di Wilayah adalah dikuasai oleh DAP. Jika ini berlaku bermaksud secara automatik DAP lah yg akan memperolehi kuasa majoriti kpd kerajaan campuran PR di Selangor. Jan 1, 2009
Murder of Palestinian by Israeli Force

The world has been shaken again by recent military strike on Gaza soil in recent weeks. Countless air-strikes endlessly attacking Gaza street & lands.
Since then, peoples around the world condemn this attack. By today total of Palestinian died was 390 (24 kids among the dead) & 1900 people wounded. As the body count of the dead Palestinians keeps on growing what is the people’s of the world doing?
Even a statement from U.S representative shows that they are actually blaming Palestinians for the attacks. Any cruelty by Israeli will be reflected to them since they are their closes ally in the Middle East. I cannot wait to see Barack Obama’s new policy & promises to voters which elected him as president.
What about the Arabs nation. They are the closes to Palestine. When their fellow neighbours in jeopardy what do they do to help?
The failure of strict policy by U.S will only turns more moderate Muslims to extremist. More Osama Laden like personnel will emerge whether the world wants it or not.
Malaysian & Politics On this Issue
Sad to hear only 500 people participate in demo against the cruelty of this madness compared to political rally. Are Malaysian more interested in joining political based rally such as “Jerit” & “Hindraf” rather than this caused.
I duly respect Tun on his firm stands on this issue all the while. He’s among the leaders of the world which really against & condemns Israel. Even he is among the figure which Israel really hates due to this.
What about other political leaders? I must say all political quarters should make a statement against this & make events to condemn this.
I would like to see leaders from every different quarter of parties together in a rally to condemns this. Can we? Why cant leaders from PAS, DAP, UMNO, PKR, MCA, MIC & others make a small rally condemning this ?
What Should We Do.
Can we do something about it? Yes, we can. But we are reluctant to do so. We are not willing to sacrifice our lifestyle for the sake of people half way around the world of which we have no common grounds except for our religion
Perhaps we should stop buying Israel products as a protest of Israel's aggressions. Let's start with the persimmons. Government should ban the import of Israel persimmons. Buy from China or other places.
As a Muslim, what I can do is send my prayers & doa’ to those effected & hope that may the gods repay back the blood debts created by the Zionist. I also suggest that in one day all mosques in the world should donate their entire Friday prayers donation just to help Palestine (only one day should help them). Maybe we can start in Malaysians mosque 1st.
It is obligatory on Muslims everywhere to seek peace but not war at any price.
My muslims brothers in GAZA. May Allah helps you on this war upon you.
Dec 24, 2008
PPSMI : Wajarkah diteruskan @ dibatalkan?
Malah website @ gerakan anti-PPSMI telahpun ditubuhkan & mendapat sokongan byk pihak. PKPIM juga merupakan antara badan NGO yg menentang perlaksanaan PPSMI.
Saya sebenar pada awalnya berbelah bagi bila berhadapan isu ini pada masa lalu. Tetapi keadaan telah berubah bilamana 'feedback' dr rakan2 guru di pedalaman menyatakan PPSMI hanya akan menyisihkan pelajar luar bandar. Siapa lagi yg patut beri pendapat? Adakah persidangan meja bulat yg dihadiri oleh cerdik pandai & intelektual ?
Saya berpendapat org yg paling layak merupakan guru2 di pedalaman adalah insan malaysia yg paling layak memberikan pendapat dalam isu ini.
Kepada pihak kementerian & ahli2 meja bulat! Tidakkah mereka pergi melihat, membuat kajian & mencari 'feedback' pada pelajar2 pedalaman? Tidakkah mereka bertanya pada guru2 yg penat lelah jerih mengajar dlm bahasa yg tidak difahami oleh murid? Adakah sanggup kerajaan mengorbankan pelajar2 luar bandar hanya utk memenuhi selera sesetengah intelektual & pelajar2 bandar. Lebih kajian diperlukan utk mengesan impak kehadapan bila perkara ini dilaksanakan.
UNESCO.
Laporan pakar-pakar pendidikan luar negara dan UNESCOmenunjukkan bahawa perubahan bahasa pengantar dalam keadaan kanak-kanakmasih belum menguasai bahasa ibunda akan memburukkan prestasi pembelajaranmereka. Ini kerana kanak-kanak seharusnya menggunakan bahasa yang merekapaling fahami untuk tujuan belajar supaya mencapai keberkesanan pembelajaranyang optimum, terutamanya dalam mata pelajaran Sains dan Matematik. Sekalipun menggunakan bahasa ibunda, kedua-dua mata pelajaran ini masih menjadi satumasalah untuk dikuasai sepenuhnya, maka sekiranya bahasa asing yang merekakurang biasa dijadikan bahasa pengantar bagi mata pelajaran Sains dan Matematik,sudah pasti menjejaskan keberkesanan pembelajaran dengan teruk sekali.
Kajian luar negara membuktikan bahawa penggunaan bahasa kedua atau bahasaselain daripada bahasa ibunda dalam peringkat awal persekolahan akan membawakesan negatif terhadap perkembangan daya pemikiran kanak-kanak danmenyebabkan kemerosotan prestasi akademik dalam mata pelajaran Sains,Matematik dan bahasa. Maka, kepentingan pendidikan bahasa ibunda amatditegaskan oleh pakar-pakar pendidikan luar negara dan UNESCO.
KONGRESS PENDIDIKAN MELAYU.Kongres Pendidikan Melayu Ke-2 yang dianjurkan pada bulan Mac 2005,secara lantang menunjukkan bahawa kira-kira 500 ribu orang pelajar Melayu akan keciciran dalam Sains dan Matematik akibat kegagalan menguasaibahasa Inggeris. Tidak dilupa tentangan juga diterima daripada pihak2 SJK Tamil & Cina.
Perlaksaan PPSMI pada saya harus ditentang kerana tiada manfaatnya pada pelajar di peringkat awal. Apa masalahnya kalau belajar dalam Bahasa Malaysia @ dwi-bahasa? Jgn kita bebankan lagi murid2 yg rata2 berumur lingkungan 7-12 tahun dgn 'high expectation' drpd kita. Jika tujuan adalah utk meningkatkan penguasaan Bahasa Inggeris terlalu byk cara lain yg berkesan. Ini adalah antara cara 'simple' pihak kementerian boleh laksanakan demi utk meningkatkan penguasaan bahasa kedua ini :-
1- Menganjurkan lebih byk pertandingan debat / kuiz sains & matematik dlm bahasa inggeris di luar bandar.
2- Menganjurkan seminar bahasa inggeris yg wajib dihadiri oleh pelajar2 sekolah. (ala2 PLKN). Terutama pada pelajar2 yg lemah bahasa inggeris.
3- Menambahkan lebih byk tenaga pengajar di bidang bahasa inggeris.
4- Buat kempen supaya ibu bapa mengasuh menggunakan bahasa Inggeris dirumah.
Banyak lagi cadangan mungkin boleh dibincangkan utk meningkatkan penguasaan bahasa universal (BI) ttp jgnlah sehinggakan Bahasa Malaysia dianaktirikan sedemikian rupa.
Syabas diucapkan pada Dato' Khir Toyo yg juga bertegas menentang pelaksanaan PPSMI. Malah beliau juga memberikan pendapat yg baik dlm menambah baikkan keberkesanan PPSMI. Adalah hairan bilamana kebanyakan ahli politik tidak bersuara bila berhadapan dgn isu ini.
Di mana PAS dalam isu memperjuangkan Bahasa Melayu dalam Matematik dan Sains (PPSMI)?
Mereka lantang mengkritik bila berhadapan dgn isu2 tertentu. Ttp dalam isu ini, tidak terdengar kenyataan pimpinan tertinggi dlm berhadapan isu ini meskipun pada permulaan dahulunya merekalah yg menentang idea tersebut. Kenapa sekarang diam membisu?
Dimana suara PKR sedangkan didalam Kongress mereka baru2 ini ada perwakilan guru yg menaikkan isu tersebut ? Kenapa Dato' Seri Anwar diam membisu isu ini? Adakah takut hilang penyokong ?
Dimana lagi suara2 pejuang2 Bahasa Kebangsaan yg lain. Mana suara2 kepimpinan UMNO yg lain? Jgn hanya berckp soal bangsa ttp asas bahasa tidak dipertahankan.
Kesimpulannya perlaksaan PPSMI hanya akan mengkronikkan masalah keciciran pelajar hatta akan meningkatkan jurang perbezaan bandar vs Luar bandar. Jgnlah jadi seperti "Kera di hutan disusukan, anak dirumah mati kelaparan".
Lagi pandangan Isu ini
- PPSMI perosak Bangsa Malaysia
Dec 23, 2008
Ujian Saringan HIV & Islam

Cadangan kerajaan utk mewajibkan Ujian Saringan HIV dilihat sbg cadangan yg amat bernas. Malahan terdapat negeri2 yg telah melaksanakan ujian saringan tersebut iaitu Negeri Johor & juga bbrp negeri lain.
Pada pandangan saya, ini merupakan idea yg baik. Jika hak asasi manusia yg dijadikan Isu. Apa pula hak sbg bakal isteri & bakal anak yg dikandung. Jgn dilihat ujian ini sbg penghalang kepada mereka2 yg nak berkahwin. Malah ujian ini amat bagus memandangkn pasangan akan mengetahui keadaan kesihatan pasangan masing2 sebelum berkahwin.
Hanya mereka2 yg mempunyai gaya hidup tidak sihat sahaja yg mungkin takut pada cadangan tersebut. Saya lihat cadangan tersebut menjadi salah satu faktor utk tidak melakukan maksiat. (Sekurang2nya ada satu lagi faktor rasa takut pada insan utk melakukan dosa).
Pada NGO yg diwakili oleh bukan Islam. Kenapa perlu bantah pada cadangan yg hanya akan dilaksanakan kpd org2 Islam. Cukuplah 'interfear' dgn agama org lain. Ini merupakan cadangan kepada pasangan iSlam sahaja.. Saya tidak nampak ia tidak dpt dilaksanakan kerana ia telah lama dipraktikkan oleh negeri JOHOR & kebanyakan negeri.
Tidak lupa jugak, kita tidak perlulah pandangan yg ekstrim yaitu "pembawa perlu dikuarantin". Jgn lah sampai mcm tu. Tak eloklah. Dia pun manusia juga. Mungkin bukan atas kehendak dia menjadi pembawa HIV. Biarlah mereka mendapatkan rawatan yg sewajarnya & jika pasangan masing2 tidak kisah mereka pembawa HIV maka teruslah berkahwin. Bukan bermakna jika salah satu pasangan dikesan sbg positif maka Jabatan agama ISlam akan menghalang mereka berkahwin. Sesi kaunseling akan diadakan utk mmberitahu risiko perkahwinan kepada pasangan. Dan jika pasangan masih mahu berkahwin saya rasa Jabatan Agama tiada halangan.
Saya cadangkan jika kebanyakan rakyat bersetuju dgn saranan ini perlu diperluaskan lagi kepada semua pasangan di seluruh malaysia tidak kira islam @ bukan ISlam.
Saranan ujian ini mendapat reaksi baik dr ahli2 politik, akedemik, NGO, Institusi Raja malahan org ramai. Saya amat kagum pada pertama kalinya saya lihat terdapat titik pertemuan @ kesepakatan dlm sesuatu isu. Kenyataan dr Dato' Najib, Ir Nizar & juga Tengku Mahkota Pahang menunjukkan perkembangan yg menarik dlm politik & kepimpinan tanahair.
Akhir kata saya nak pinjam kata2 Prof ini (dipetik dr akhbar Utusan): -
"Sesungguhnya langkah terkehadapan yg diambil oleh pihak pentadbir ISLAM itu harus diteladani kerana kesan & manfaatnya terbukti bersifat universal & boleh digunapakai utk semua kaum di Malaysia." - Prof. Dr. Mohamed Yusoff Ismail Dekan, Fakulti Sains Sosial Gunaan, Open University Malaysia.
Dec 17, 2008
1st Class Treatment? A look into Bukit Antarabangsa Tragedy.

*Even MB suggest to give them good accommodations hotel with half price by state government? -why this such treatment occurs only for this people? why there's no such statement given to flood victims & storm victims in Selangor before this? Let them live in school like the rest of other victims around Malaysia. Why should we give them 1st class treatment in a expense of tax payers money.?
* Even Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin suggested the effected people been provided with free hotels.
*Even free taxi rides also offered. - Great spirit but perhaps it should be done for other tragedy as well. Not selective & seasonal sentiments.
*Even permanent bridge were set up instantly. Kudos. - Compared to what happen in Sabah & Sarawak. They were left for several weeks before roads were restored. Maybe this rural folk dint have that high connection & less vocal that's why they're left out. This kind of action maybe does not applies to rural people perhaps?
Dec 1, 2008
Scrap vernacular schools, one system for all. Mukhriz
KUALA LUMPUR Monday December 1, 2008 : Umno Youth chief aspirant Datuk Mukhriz Mahathir has called on the Government to abolish the vernacular school system as a means to enhance unity among people of various races.
He said a single school system was the only way to check the racial polarisation that was getting out of control in the country.
“The government should consider introducing only one school system with Bahasa Malaysia as the medium of instruction, except for Science and Mathematics which are already being taught in English.
“Of course, pupils should then be given the option to study their mother tongues. Under this system, the Malays will also have the option of studying other languages like Mandarin and Tamil and this will further boost unity among them,” he told reporters at Parliament House on Monday.
The Umno Youth exco member said it was time for Malaysia to do away with the dual school system, which was practised by only a handful of countries in the world, as it had contributed to the problem of disunity in the country.
He said over 99% of countries in the world practised a single school system.
He expressed hope that leaders of Barisan Nasional component parties would not take his suggestion in a negative light as it was only meant as a suggestion to resolve, once and for all, the problem of racial polarisation affecting the citizenry.
“If they reject this suggestion, then they should explain why they are against it. How is it possible for them on one hand to talk about unity and question Malay rights, while on the other hand still insist on having a different school system for their race?
“If you want equal rights then you cannot have a different school system. You cannot have your cake and eat it too,” he added.
He also urged all parties to stop harping on issues that could create tension among Barisan component parties, including on the issue of Ketuanan Melayu or Malay supremacy.
Lately, he said, there were many statements made by leaders of component parties that had the potential to create anger among the Malays and Umno members.
“If they insist on making statements on that issue, then do not be surprised if the Malays start talking about the economic supremacy of the non-Malays.
“Despite all that has been said on the issue of Malay supremacy, the Malays do not feel in any ---way superior or the master when it comes to the country’s economy,” he said.
-----------------
Other Perspektif :-
At last somebody have the guts to speak. Dato' Mukriz i salute u. I hope more MP's from UMNO, PKR & PAS are supporting this. Why can't we assimilate with other races. A lot of blogger are talking about this since a long time. I've also express my feeling towards this issue last month in one of my article. The non-malay spoke openly about malay rights, ketuanan melayu & other thing. Let us see how will they react by this.
I'm not surprise if they call Dato Mukriz a racist :).
I really hope that UMNO leaders will support this ideas & PKR leader DSAI have the guts to support it as well. Also can't wait to see what DAP have to say & PAS as well. Oh not to forget MCA MIC & Gerakan. :)
We can see now who are the true leader of unity & equality which will leads us in the years to come. Not like some so called leaders which take issues selectively for political reason.
We'll see.
Nov 27, 2008
Road Sign/ Papan Tanda Issue ?
What’s your choice? What’s your stand? Probably for some of us it does not mean anything. But for others it does mean something.
Let us see from Other Perspective shall we.
From one point of view, this additional name (in other language) is actually for tourist attraction & to accommodate the tourist itself. Hm.. If that’s the case two language is not enough. Probably put some ‘France language’ or ‘Sweden language’ or ‘Norwegian language’ etc. Perhaps we should target this kind of tourist since the spending $$$ power is even greater than Indian, Arabs or Chinese Citizen.
On second thought should we go against it? I must say this might seems rather childish to make a fuss such a simple issue. After all, the public should have complained to PBT the used of other language (other than BM or BI) on advertisement & shop signs. Don’t be selective on issues related to politics. It’s been quite a while & if you guys notice there’s a lot of shops it in Johor Bharu or Penang having non-approved signs (other language than BM or BI). The used of fully other language is quite a surprise without action from PBT (Pihak Berkuasa Tempatan).
Well some may say, “its just politics” & some politicised the issue. I think both party politicised the issue. It is two parties trying to get support from the public. They don’t know in a way there making our more split due to this idiotic issue. (I blame both party)
In the mean time, the government should make an amendment of the law on usage of language. Prioritise national language & make it compulsory. Maybe some exception can be given to certain areas for other areas. Make it a clear guideline & discuss. When it been gazetted then nobody can question it. I think this in a way will clear the problem. Now there are a lot of grey areas & different people interpret their own way.
Honestly, I’m against the suggestion. For me why we make something out of nothing? What bring it up? It’s like installing a toilet in the middle of public areas. Some will be against it & of course upset people. And some will be supporting even though they are not suggested or used one. But at the end of the day you can make both parties happy by not having one. Just scarp the idea.
Why not? Case close right?
Nov 11, 2008
Cheaper 'Roti'.. Does it makes any different.
Then stop blaming other for our misfortune! Grow UP.. (Same goes to me as well).
---------
Nov 10, 2008
Singapura belum sedia pilih PM bukan Cina – Hsien Loong

http://www.utusan.com.my/utusan/info.asp?y=2008&dt=1110&pub=Utusan_Malaysia&sec=Muka_Hadapan&pg=mh_02.htm
--------------
Other Perspektif :---Tidak terkejut mendengar kenyataan berikut drpd PM Singapura. Inilah bakal jadinya pada Malaysia jika Hak Keistimewaan Org Melayu dihapuskan. Sedih melihat negara yg mempunyai 14% Kaum Melayu dinafikan hak utk sama2 memerintah negara. Tidak seorg pun Menteri Kabinet daripada Kaum Minoriti. Jika dibandingkan dgn Malaysia kaum minoriti lebih bertuah. Disamping mempunyai ramai yg memegang portfolia Menteri mereka juga memegang banyak jawatan dlm badan kerajaan, Kerajaan negeri & lain-lain. Mestipun MP kaum lain (BN) kalah teruk dlm PRU-12 kerajaan masih tidak mengusik kuota kaum atas dasar semangat setiakawan. Tetapi madu dibalas tuba.
Oct 9, 2008
Hindraf & Hari Raya
For me this pertubuhan is same like Al-Maunah, Al-Arqam & other related pertubuhan that the government banned. Though actually the government is quite lineant on this movement. If its the era of Tuns M i bet they will get caught even before the protest begins.
Anyway not to divert what i want to say today. I've quite disappointed on that day (1st Syawal) which supposed to be the celebration day for Muslims was been tainted with the incident. Never in 51 years of our independent such incident had happened.
& Yes of course Muslims are anger. No need to blame Utusan or media. The question is such event taken place in the holy day for Muslims. For majority of Muslims, we cannot tolerate this for whatever reason is.
Hopefully this kind of event will be the last.
Jul 4, 2008
Revision of Subsidy System - How much u are getting subsidy previously?
I think you will think twice & when you read my opinion below.
1)A company which has a lot of his staff travelling
Car : various car
Fuel Consumption : 5000 liter/month
Subsidy : 0.70 cent
Total subsidy receive : RM 3500.00
2)Myself
Car :- Sedan car 1.6 CBU
Fuel Consumption : 1000 liter/month (my work intends me to travel a lot)
Subsidy : 0.70 cent
Total subsidy i receive : RM 700.00/month
3)My neighbour
Car : Proton Wira
Fuel Consumption : 500 liter/month
Subsidy : 0.70 cent
Total subsidy i receive : RM 350.00/month
4)Fellow rural people in Langkawi for example.
Fuel Consumption : 50 liter/month
Subsidy : 0.70 cent
Total subsidy i receive : RM 35.00/month
5)Lastly, All the Pakcik2 & makcik in Kampung who use motorcycle
Fuel consumption :- 10 liter/month
Subsidy :- let say 0.70sen
Subsidy per/month :- RM 7.00
I think by now you already understand what I'm trying to highlight here.
Do you think myself & company eligible to get the subsidy? This is just an example, imagine there's a lot of people in city's falls under category 1, 2 & 3. Probably 80% of the consumer of fuel are from urban areas. Well, that's quite a lot for people getting it. What about the rural people? The one that really need help? Is it fair for us in urban getting a lot of subsidy when the rural people getting so less.
If we translate it into money wise. Actually the rural people only get RM 84.00/year. Instate
of myself getting RM 8400.00/year. Is it fair?
The current system of subsidy actually are not fair at all. It will only protects or give advantage to urban people which will makes the rich gets richer & the poor gets poorer. It is good that the government float the fuel price according to international price same as what United States & other states are doing. Even if they want to give subsidy just a little bit just to show the government are giving back. RM 0.30
Some say the subsidy effected food prices & they are really pity the poor. Yes. I agree. Having said that the subsidy previously been given to no 1. 2 & 3 should be channeled back to the poor people. Probably give subsidy in terms of food & other related stuff which will have a great impact to them.
That's the idea. That's why i think that the previous subsidy system are not relevant anymore. If the current system now still question mark due to still the rich will benefit the most.
Because the subsidy only benefit the rich people who i think does not deserve it.
I will come back with another post on how to use the cut subsidy to help the poor..
Jun 18, 2008
Petronas Staff Speaks-- Other Perspektif
Dear all, After reading all the chain mai ls and blogs, I feel called to reply, because of the relentless attacks and allegations -- most of which are inaccurate or baseless -- against
PETRONAS.
PETRONAS' STAFF SALARY & BONUS
1) The salaries paid to PETRONAS' employees are not as high as people think. At best, they are just industry average. And these are not attractive enough for some who left PETRONAS to find work at other companies ( mai nly from the Middle East ) which are willing to pay more. Why do they pay more? The oil and gas industry worldwide has been facing acute shortage of qualified or experienced personnel, so most companies are willing to pay lots of money to entice and pinch staff from their competitors.Bonus? There has NEVER been a bonus amounting to 6 months or 12 months throughout the 33 years. On average, it is 2 months. But don't ever think we don't deserve it. We more than deserve it. A lot of us work really hard, some in the most extreme of conditions. Those who have been to and worked in northern Sudan , for example, would testify that it's like working in a huge blower oven. Southern Sudan , on the other hand, is almost all swamps and mud. Imagine having to go through that kind of heat, or waddling in muddy swamps, day in and day out.
QUALITY OF CRUDE & REFINED PRODUCTS
2) Malaysia produces about 600,000 barrels of crude oil per day (and about 100,000 barrels condensate). Of this crude volume, 339,000 barrels are refined locally for local consumption. The rest is exported (and yes, because it has lower sulphur content it fetches higher prices).Malaysia also imports about 230,000 barrels of crude oil per day, mai nly from the Middle East , to be refined here. This crude oil contains higher sulphur and is less expensive (so the country gains more by exporting our crudes). In Malaysia , this crude is processed by PETRONAS at its second refinery in Melaka, and also by Shell at its Port Dickson refinery.Different refineries are built and configurated to refine different types of crude. And each crude type yields different percentage of products (diesel, gasoline, kerosene, cooking gas etc) per barrel. But most importantly, products that come out at the end of the refining process have the same good quality regardless of the crude types. That's why PETRONAS, Shell and Exxon Mobil share the same pipeline to transport the finished products from their refineries to a distribution centre in the Klang Valley . The three companies collect the products at this centre accordingly to be distributed to their respective distribution networks. What makes PETRONAS' petrol different from Shell's, for example, is the additive that each company adds.
PETRONAS' ROLE, FUNCTION & CONTRIBUTION
3) A lot of people also do not understand the role and function of PETRONAS, which is essentially a company, a business entity, which operates on a commercial manner, to mai nly generate income and value for its shareholder. In this case, PETRONAS' shareholder is the Government. In 1974, when PETRONAS was set up, the Government gave PETRONAS RM10 million (peanuts, right?) as seed capital. From 1974 to 2007, PETRONAS made RM570 billion in accumulated profits, and returned to the Government a total of RM335.7 billion. That is about 65% of the profits. That means for every RM1 that PETRONAS makes, 65 sen goes back to the Government.Last year, PETRONAS made a pre-tax profit of RM86.8 billion. The amount given back to the Government (in royalty, dividends, corporate income tax, petroleum products income tax and export duty) was RM52.3 billion. The rest of the profit was used to pay off minority interests and taxes in foreign countries (about RM7.8 billion - PETRONAS now operates in more than 30 countries), and the re mai ning RM26.7 billion was reinvested. The amount reinvested seems a lot, but the oil and gas industry is technology- and capital-intensive. Costs have gone up exponentially in the last couple of years. Previously, to drill a well, it cost about US$3 million; now it costs US$7 million. The use of rigs was US$200,000 a day a couple of years ago; now it costs US$600,000 a day. A lot of people also do not realise that the amount returned by PETRONAS to the Government makes up 35% of the Government's total annual income, to be used by the Government for expenditures, development, operations, and yes, for the various subsidies. That means for every RM1 the Government makes, 35 sen is contributed by PETRONAS. So, instead of asking what happens to PETRIONAS' money or profits, people should be questioning how the money paid by PETRONAS to the Government is allocated.
CRUDE EXPORTS & FUEL PRICES
4) A lot of people also ask, why Malaysia exports its crude oil. Shouldn't we just stop exporting and sell at cheaper prices to local refiners? If Malaysia is an oil exporting country, why can't we sell petrol or diesel at cheaper prices like other oil producing countries in the Middle East ?I guess I don't have to answer the first couple of questions. It's simple economics, and crude oil is a global commodity.Why can't we sell petrol and diesel at lower prices like in the Middle East ? Well, comparing Saudi Arabia and other big producers to Malaysia is like comparing kurma to durian, because these Middle Eastern countries have much, much, much bigger oil and gas reserves.Malaysia has only 5.4 billion barrels of oil reserves, and about 89 trillion cubic feet of gas. Compare that to Saudi Arabia 's 260 billion barrels of oil and 240 trillion cubic feet of gas. Malaysia only produces 600,000 barrels per day of oil. Saudi Arabia produces 9 million barrels per day. At this rate, Saudi Arabia 's crude oil sales revenue could amount to US$1.2 billion per day! At this rate, it can practically afford almost everything -- free education, healthcare, etc, and subsidies -- for its people.But if we look at these countries closely, they have in the past few years started to come up with policies and strategies designed to prolong their reserves and diversify their income bases. In this sense, Malaysia (and PETRONAS) has had a good head start, as we have been doing this a long time.Fuel prices in Malaysia is controlled by the Government based on a formula under the Automatic Pricing Mechanism introduced more than a couple of decades ago. It is under this mechanism that the complex calculation of prices is made, based on the actual cost of petrol or diesel, the operating costs, margin for dealers, margin for retail oil companies (including PETRONAS Dagangan Bhd) and the balancing number of duty or subsidy. No retail oil companies or dealers actually make money from the hike of the fuel prices. Oil companies pay for the products at market prices, but have to sell low, so the Government reimburses the difference -- thus subsidy.Subsidy as a concept is OK as long as it benefits the really deserving segment of the population. But there has to be a limit to how much and how long the Government should bear and sustain subsidy. An environment where prices are kept artificially low indefinitely will not do anyone any good. That's why countries like Indonesia are more pro-active in removing subsidies. Even Vietnam (which is a socialist country, by the way) is selling fuel at market prices.
PETRONAS & TRANSPARENCY
5) I feel I also need to say something on the allegation that PETRONAS is not transparent in terms of its accounts, business transactions etc.PETRONAS is first and foremost a company, operating under the rules and regulations of the authorities including the Registrar of Companies, and the Securities Commission and Bursa Malaysia for its listed four subsidiaries (PETRONAS Dagangan Bhd, PETRONAS Gas Bhd, MISC Bhd and KLCC Property Holdings Bhd.PETRONAS the holding company produces annual reports which are made to whomever wants them, and are distributed to many parties and places; including to the library at the Parliament House for perusal and reading pleasure of all Yang Berhormat MPs (if they care to read). PETRONAS also makes the annual report available on its website, for those who bother to look. The accounts are duly audited. The website also contains a lot of useful information, if people really care to find out. Although PETRONAS is not listed on Bursa Malaysia , for all intents and purposes, it could be considered a listed entity as its bonds and financial papers are traded overseas. This requires scrutiny from investors, and from rating agencies such as Standard & Poor and Moody's.
BOYCOTT PETRONAS?
6) The last time I checked, this is still a democratic country, where people are free to spend their money wherever they like. For those who like to see more of the money that they spend go back to the local economy and benefiting their fellow Malaysians, perhaps they should consider sticking to local products or companies. For those who like to see that the money they spend go back to foreign shareholders of the foreign companies overseas, they should continue buying foreign products.
FINAL WORD (FOR TODAY)
I'm sorry this is rather long, but I just have to convey it. I hope this would help some of you out there understand something. The oil and gas industry, apart from being very capital intensive, is also very complex and volatile. I'm learning new things almost every single day.Appreciate if you could help to forward this response to as many contacts as possible to counter the subversive proposal out there. Thank you.

